In an interview on CNBC’s “Squawk Box” (Feb. 9) EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt told CNBC he does not believe carbon dioxide is a major contributor to climate change. Within minutes, scores of climate activists and groups drew their swords and attacked Mr. Pruitt.
We disagree with Mr. Pruitt, but we’re not like other groups. We’d prefer to meet with him, along with our network of conservative scientists, utility company executives, and financial analysts, to discuss a path forward that protects our American way of life.
The public policy debate over carbon dioxide emissions, climate change, and our energy future is the living definition of zero sum game theory. Sides have been chosen. Republicans and conservatives picked the fossil fuel industry. Democrats and progressives took renewable energy. Nearly everyone has been blinded by the effort to not give up a single inch of ground. And now, after fifteen years of that zero sum politics, Americanscan’t see the forest for the trees. We are so busy looking for places to fight each other that we ignore the need to work together.
Many on the right will not admit, publicly, that carbon dioxide emissions are the primary driver of rising global temperatures, simply because admitting that would mean their side would lose ground.
But, the science is clear: Graphs of atmospheric carbon dioxide levels and average global temperatures show a precise correlation. After centuries—thousands of years—of stability, both CO2 and temperatures began to climb, in lock step, with the advent of the Industrial Revolution. The University of Oklahoma, home to the South Central Climate Science Center, and part of the same state government Mr. Pruitt served as Attorney General, can demonstrate this fact with overwhelming evidence.
The game-theory reluctance to acknowledge the science is just one tree in the forest. Fortunately, it is one of very few blocking the view of leaders on the right. There are many more trees blocking the vision of progressives with which we need to deal.
James Pinkerton, writing at The American Conservative, covered this ground in greater depth and erudition than we will here. He points out the immovability of the current ‘all or nothing’ positions of right and left in our country, but he adeptly lifts the entire forest into view for everyone to see by stating, “We might start with the presumption that the real goal isn’t stopping fossil fuels; instead, the real goal is stopping atmospheric CO2. By this reckoning, hydrocarbons, by themselves, are not the problem: the problem, instead, is the unwanted by-product, carbon dioxide.”
According to the Department of Energy, renewable sources provide 11% of the United State’s energy today (not counting nuclear). Fossil fuels account for 81% of our energy and employ 9 million of our fellow citizens in relatively good paying jobs. Fossil fuel dependent energy companies represent $10 trillion of wealth. Progressives argue we can throw a switch and go completely renewable tomorrow. It simply isn’t true. It’s just one of their talking points used to motivate their followers.
We’ve said this before, many times: utility companies are not the enemy! Utility companies are agnostic on how they generate electricity. Public service commissions or legislators could order every electricity generator to immediately move to renewable energy. As long as the PUCs permitted the utilities to pass along their stranded costs to you and me in the form of drastically higher electric bills, utilities would be fine with itif it were possible. The problem is that it isn’t possible right now and it will take years…decades…to plan and build out new systems of generation.
Given the facts, shouldn’t we be moving full speed ahead on technology to capture, use, split or store carbon dioxide? Pinkerton reported, “More recently, on February 15, Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), chairman of the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, argued for a redoubled effort by our national laboratories to work on the hard science of carbon capture, with an eye toward new breakthroughs. As Smith put it, “Through its national labs, DOE has an exemplary track record on basic research.”
Carbon capture, use, and storage (CCUS) is critical globally. The United States has around 323 coal plants in operation. Worldwide, there are nearly eight thousand, with 1,200 new ones under construction. For anyone who believes carbon emissions from burning coal is a major contributor to climate change, which is every atmospheric science organization, then incenting American-made CCUS technology must be a major effort. Someone has to solve the coal – carbon dioxide issue; and America is the world’s leader in patents and innovation. If America closes its 323 coal-fired generation stations we won’t be able to develop the solution for the 8,000 and growing plants around the world.
But with all that, the major problem, in our estimation, isn’t Republican refusal to admit carbon dioxide is a primary driver of global warming. It is the left’s “all or nothing” position on nearly everything. Their “keep it in the ground” mantra is just one example. There are others:
Last November, the first-in-the-nation carbon tax proposal appeared on the State of Washington’s ballot. Progressive groups opposed and defeated it, despite their decade-long pursuit of carbon tax policy, because it was revenue neutral, a wonky way of saying that if approved, no funds would have flowed to their progressive coalition partners.
Just last week, in Arizona, ConservAmerica exerted leadership in a major settlement at the Arizona Corporation Commission with that state’s largest utility company. Progressives paint a pretty picture of every American home with rooftop solar panels as a component of how we can go 100% renewable in short time. The fact is, rooftop solar is only available to the top third of Americans–those wealthy enough to plunk down $15,000 or those with a credit score sufficient to buy or lease a system.
Several progressive groups fought our proposal which will enable the utility company to invest $45 million installing solar on the homes of those who otherwise couldn’t afford it. The program, AZ Sun II directs the investment into low to moderate income homes.
To reiterate, utility companies are not the enemy. In fact, if we really want to roll out more solar, equitably, and in a manner that makes our grid more efficient, we need utilities to partner in what we call Blue Collar Solar programs like AZ Sun II.
The progressive “keep it in the ground” movement is idealistic, but wrong. $10 trillion of wealth invested in the fossil fuel economy, nine millions jobs, and physics stand in their way. The path forward is not a zero sum game, and America cannot afford perpetual “all or nothing” battles if we’re to protect our environment, economy, and national security.
ConservAmerica’s Zero Regrets energy policy is a roadmap all Americans can follow. Zero Regrets removes taxes from zero emission energy sources and gives fossil fuel users incentives to progressively lower emissions. It protects the U.S. economy, tackles climate change, and spurs American innovation to sell to the rest of the world. And we can’t wait to discuss it with Mr. Pruitt.
Multi-party rate case settlement will spread benefits of solar to working families
Up to $45 million slated to put solar on low-to-moderate income households
Phoenix, Arizona: The benefits of rooftop solar are about to broaden substantially in the state of Arizona, thanks to a groundbreaking decision regarding how utility customers pay for their electricity and gain access to solar installation for their own homes. A new proposed settlement to the Arizona Public Service (APS) rate case, in which ConservAmerica was a key intervener, will make installing rooftop solar more affordable for working families. The settlement must be approved later this year by the Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC) in order to go into effect.
ConservAmerica, the leading voice for conservative and market-based solutions to environmental challenges, joined with several other entities in advocacy for the Arizona Blue Collar Solar program, which will invest up to $45 million in solar solutions for families with low to moderate incomes, and for making payment for solar electricity more equitable among households with and without rooftop solar. Paul Walker, Executive Director of ConservAmerica and an Arizona resident, led the organization’s efforts to spread the environmental and economic benefits of rooftop solar more equitably among his fellow citizens.
“Arizona has the chance to become the national leader in assuring access for all to rooftop solar,” explained Walker. “And, with the proposed settlement of the APS rate case, we’re also eliminating the unfair cost shift that forced blue- collar families to pay more for electricity while having limited chances to install rooftop solar on their own homes.”
“Over 95 percent of rooftop solar installations in the U.S. have gone on the homes of the wealthiest 60 percent of households,” noted Congresswoman Nan Hayworth, ConservAmerica Chair, “yet every consumer has to pay the taxes and surcharges that support rooftop solar. APS’s Sun II program will even the playing field for families with low and moderate incomes.”
“ConservAmerica will now work beyond our success in the APS rate case to ensure that more states follow Arizona’s lead and approve their own Blue Collar Solar programs,” Hayworth continued. “Allowing every household the chance to have rooftop solar at an affordable rate is the American way.”
Walker emphasized that both of ConservAmerica’s objectives as an intervener in the Arizona rate case have been met, pending a key approval: “First, to provide a way for low and moderate income households to get rooftop solar, which has been accomplished by APS’s providing up to $45 million for that purpose. Second, to address the cost shift between solar and non-solar homes so that everyone pays their fair share. The settlement achieves both goals, and we urge the ACC to approve it.”
ConservAmerica joined APS, the Arizona Community Action Alliance, the Residential Utility Consumers Office, Arizona Corporation Commission Staff, the Arizona Solar Energy Industries Association, the Arizona Solar Deployment Alliance, and the Energy Freedom Coalition of America in achieving this innovative settlement. As an intervener, ConservAmerica filed two rounds of testimony prior to the beginning of the settlement negotiations.
### END ###
About ConservAmerica: ConservAmerica is a 501(c)4 organization whose mission is to facilitate conservative and market-based solutions to environmental challenges. For over twenty years we’ve worked with Congress, state governments, and the public on innovative approaches to conservation and energy that respect both our natural resources and our economic resources. To learn more, visit: www.conservamerica.org
Arizona Office: 209 East Baseline Road, E-102, Office 4, Tempe, Arizona85283
Michigan Office: 971 South Centerville Road PMB 139, Sturgis, Michigan 49091
(Washington, D.C.)—ConservAmerica, the premier organization dedicated to conservation and environmental protection via conservative approaches, elected The Honorable Nan Hayworth as chair of its board of directors at their annual meeting in Washington, D.C. last week, succeeding Tina Beattie.
Dr. Hayworth represented New York’s 19th District in the House of Representatives. An ophthalmologist with degrees from Princeton and Cornell, she is the only female physician ever elected a Member of Congress. During her time in the House she was recognized by several organizations for her advocacy in behalf of conservation and animal welfare.
“To follow in Tina Beattie’s footsteps is a great honor and an even greater opportunity,” Hayworth noted. “ConservAmerica has a crucial mission and, thanks to years of work by a superbly talented and dedicated team and board, we’re positioned to effect change for the better at both the state and federal levels. Our conservative solutions are the right ones for our environment and our economy.”
Ms. Beattie, who has served ConservAmerica as board chair for the past six years, led the organization through a major rebranding and restructuring process. Ms. Beattie, co-owner of a restaurant enterprise; founder of Main St. Shop, an internet retailer of American-made gifts; and the mother a son in college and of two young daughters, will now become vice chair of the ConservAmerica board.
“It has been my sincere pleasure to serve as the Chair of ConservAmerica. I am eminently thankful for Nan’s leadership and knowledge as we continue to advocate for pragmatic and realistic solutions to address the environmental challenges we face while preserving not only our natural heritage, but bright economic future for the next generation.” said Tina Beattie.
“Over the past 15 years, I’ve had the privilege of working with Tina to grow ConservAmerica’s reach and impact, and I look forward to continuing to work with her and, now, with Nan as we enter an exciting time with a new Congress and administration,” said ConservAmerica president Rob Sisson. “My respect for these two leaders and their talents, passion, and enthusiasm is boundless.”
“With our zero-emissions energy policy now being drafted into legislation in Congress, Nan’s knowledge of the legislative process and politics will help to assure its success,” added Paul Walker, ConservAmerica executive director. “Tina has been an invaluable partner in our work, and she will continue to be.”
ConservAmerica, founded in 1995, is a 501c4 organization focused on conservative solutions to environmental and conservation issues.
WASHINGTON — A utility regulator in Pennsylvania says the Cuomo administration’s lack of urgency toward building pipelines could create a “complete disaster” in power generation.
At a natural gas conference in Washington on Tuesday, commissioner Robert Powelson of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission criticized New York’s cautious approach on pipeline capacity, joking to conference attendees that Gov. Andrew Cuomo took two hours to watch an episode of “60 Minutes.”
In a phone interview with POLITICO New York, Powelson said New York’s resistance to pipelines was hurting business and electrical grid reliability.
“The political obstruction is wreaking havoc in the ability to achieve energy policy goals to bring natural gas into the market,” he said.
The Cuomo administration has blocked or delayed a few pipeline projects. Most notably, the administration on Earth Day rejected water quality permits sought by developers of the Constitution pipeline, which would have increased the amount of natural gas coming into New York from Pennsylvania. In addition, the state has delayed a decision on the New Market pipeline expansion project, which would increase capacity by adding 33,000-horsepower of compressor stations in Central New York. The state has also ordered a full environmental review of the Pilgrim Pipeline, which would bring crude oil from Albany to New Jersey.
Powelson, a Republican, said governors in New England have united around bringing in more natural gas, but he said they are impeded by New York’s anti-pipeline policies.
“It’s 500 trillion cubic feet of natural gas,” he said. “This gas has to get to load centers, it has to be driven to markets. If one state says ‘no, no, no,’ then those other states behind that curtain are directly adversely impacted by those decisions, plain and simple.”
Powelson said the administrations of Gov. Tom Wolf of Pennsylvania and Cuomo, both Democrats, are increasingly at odds over their natural gas policy. Pennsylvania is one of the country’s biggest producers of natural gas, while New York has the largest shale deposit of the states that have banned fracking.
This summer, a report by the state’s independent grid operator found that a lack of natural gas infrastructure could harm the reliability of New York’s electrical grid, as well as the cost of power. The New York Independent System Operator concluded that a disruption in natural gas supplies could be harmful. Dominion Transmission, one of the nation’s largest energy transportation companies with 5 million utility and retail energy customers in 14 states, has said that delays in natural gas pipeline decisions are “unique to New York” among all states. National Grid has said continued low gas prices will increase demand and the need for more supply through pipelines.
The Cuomo administration’s vetoes or delays of pipeline projects have been hailed by environmental groups nationwide, and have been used to burnish the governor’s climate credentials. But state regulators have quietly acknowledged the need for more natural gas capacity in New York and have said it is important for the state’s economy to have more capacity.